Prediction of Patty Fendick vs Anne Hobbs Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Fendick vs A. Hobbs
Patty Fendick
USA
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
60
Age
66
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
19
Best Rank
35
3
Total Titles
4
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Anne Hobbs
GBR
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
60
Age
66
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
19
Best Rank
35
3
Total Titles
4
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Fendick 1 - 0 Hobbs
They have played 3 sets in total, with Patty Fendick winning 2 and Anne Hobbs winning 1. The last match between Patty Fendick and Anne Hobbs was at the Newport, 13-07-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Patty Fendick getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fendick | 1 |
| Hobbs | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R3) Newport(07-13-87)
Patty Fendick
3
6
6
Anne Hobbs
6
4
1
P. Fendick vs A. Hobbs H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.12% (254-183) | Career Total W/L | 49.40% (205-210) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Fendick vs A. Hobbs Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patty Fendick has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Anne Hobbs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patty Fendick, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Anne Hobbs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patty Fendick has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anne Hobbs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patty Fendick has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Anne Hobbs winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patty Fendick has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 137/83), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 13/14). Anne Hobbs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 59/38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 20/32).
- Player level: In the last year, Patty Fendick has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Anne Hobbs has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Patty Fendick winning 1 times and Anne Hobbs being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Patty Fendick winning 2 and Anne Hobbs winning 1.
- The last match between Patty Fendick and Anne Hobbs was at the Newport, 13-07-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Patty Fendick getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patty Fendick has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Anne Hobbs has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patty Fendick has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anne Hobbs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patty Fendick has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anne Hobbs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Patty Fendick vs Anne Hobbs Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Fendick vs A. Hobbs H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Fendick 0%, Hobbs 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Fendick 0%, Hobbs 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Fendick 0%, Hobbs 0%.
P. Fendick Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Canadian Open - 14-08-1995 | ||||
R3  Iva MajoliI. Majoli | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2  Elena MakarovaE. Makarova | W | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| San Diego - 31-07-1995 | ||||
R2  Jana NejedlyJ. Nejedly | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
 Unknown Tournament - 26-06-1995 | ||||
R1  Dominique MonamiD. Monami | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Eastbourne - 19-06-1995 | ||||
R2 Jo DurieJ. Durie | W | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
A. Hobbs Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 ITF Swindon - 06-11-1989 | ||||
R3  Jonna JonerupJ. Jonerup | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Brighton - 23-10-1989 | ||||
Q1  Tracey Morton RodgersT. Morton | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Schenectady - 24-07-1989 | ||||
R2 Patricia Hy BoulaisP. Hy | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
 Estoril - 17-07-1989 | ||||
R3  Sabine HackS. Hack | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Unknown Tournament - 26-06-1989 | ||||
R2  Gisele MiroG. Miro | W | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | ||
P. Fendick vs A. Hobbs Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.12% (254/183) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.40% (205/210) |
| 58.06% (576/416) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.22% (474/489) |
| 52.95% (4823/4285) | Games Win/Loss | 49.84% (4438/4467) |
| 62.27% (137/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 38.46% (20/32) |
| 48.15% (13/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.03% (29/34) |
| 48.98% (24/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.33% (35/54) |
| 50.00% (23/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.82% (59/38) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 303.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 224.98 |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 27.78% (5/13) |
| 64.86% (24/13) | Challenger W/L | 32.00% (8/17) |
| 61.29% (57/36) | Futures W/L | 53.85% (42/36) |
| 59% (254/432) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (200/409) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (6/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 45% (55/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (71/143) |
| 85% (258/219) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (211/168) |
| 15% (258/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (211/42) |
| 20% (179/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (200/33) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionJ. BoulaisT. MccormickW1
1.53
W2
2.31
04:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionB. SheltonF. A. AliassimeW1
1.76
W2
2.12
06:00 PM 12/11/25
Prediction
G. A. Boitan8A. IlaganW1
2.35
W2
1.51
06:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionK. PolingqD. ChanWCW1
2.4
W2
1.49
08:00 PM 12/11/25
Prediction
R. A. Burruchaga6F. MenaqW1
1.27
W2
3.34
09:00 PM 12/11/25
Prediction
M. KasnikowskiM. WiskandtW1
1.4
W2
2.68
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Nov 2025
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Taylor FritzAlex De Minaur12:00
H2H 5-5
Jannik SinnerAlexander Zverev22:30
H2H 5-4
Jannik SinnerBen SheltonH2H 7-1
Carlos AlcarazLorenzo Musetti13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal